<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drew Rosenhaus Tweet Assumes To Ignite Boldin Trade Rumors All Over Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/2009/05/09/when-drew-rosenhaus-tweets-the-bears-should-listen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/2009/05/09/when-drew-rosenhaus-tweets-the-bears-should-listen/</link>
	<description>All The Content; Unpredictable And Minus Pesky, Regurgitated Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FranciscoV</title>
		<link>http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/2009/05/09/when-drew-rosenhaus-tweets-the-bears-should-listen/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>FranciscoV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/?p=2170#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>The price is undoubtedly steep. But Boldin just might be the player to put the Bears over the top. That is, if the defense coule put up numbers form several years ago. If the defense can not, then thhis acquisition will be for nothing. Then, we would be stuck with Boldin (which is good) and no draft picks to acquire players in an aging defense (which is, needless to say, bad). 
I think there are ups and downs to both scenarios. We&#039;ll see.

Did the Bears fill their holes? Can they and will they be exposed? 
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/174019-bears-holes-may-be-worth-bearing-for-a-while-potential-still-very-good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price is undoubtedly steep. But Boldin just might be the player to put the Bears over the top. That is, if the defense coule put up numbers form several years ago. If the defense can not, then thhis acquisition will be for nothing. Then, we would be stuck with Boldin (which is good) and no draft picks to acquire players in an aging defense (which is, needless to say, bad).<br />
I think there are ups and downs to both scenarios. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Did the Bears fill their holes? Can they and will they be exposed?<br />
<a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/174019-bears-holes-may-be-worth-bearing-for-a-while-potential-still-very-good" rel="nofollow">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/174019-bears-holes-may-be-worth-bearing-for-a-while-potential-still-very-good</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JERRY</title>
		<link>http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/2009/05/09/when-drew-rosenhaus-tweets-the-bears-should-listen/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>JERRY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/?p=2170#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>I LOVE IT. GREAT TRADE SCENARIO AND ONE THAT SHOULD BE SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED. WHO CARES IF WE HAVE ANY PICKS IN NEXT YEARS DRAFT. THE GOAL IS TO WIN **NOW** NOT IN 4 YEARS!!! LETS GETTER DONE. GET BOLDEN!!!!TRADE PICKS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE IT. GREAT TRADE SCENARIO AND ONE THAT SHOULD BE SERIOUSLY CONSIDERED. WHO CARES IF WE HAVE ANY PICKS IN NEXT YEARS DRAFT. THE GOAL IS TO WIN **NOW** NOT IN 4 YEARS!!! LETS GETTER DONE. GET BOLDEN!!!!TRADE PICKS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/2009/05/09/when-drew-rosenhaus-tweets-the-bears-should-listen/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogdownchicagobears.com/?p=2170#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Your outta your F--king mind !!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your outta your F&#8211;king mind !!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
